Why Frankfurt-Style Cases Don’t Help (Much)
نویسنده
چکیده
Contemporary debates about free will and moral responsibility frequently focus on arguments around Frankfurt-style cases (FSCs). Their centrality reflects the fact that they have widely been seen to constitute a decisive step forward in a debate that had seemed to be irredeemably bogged down. In Fischer’s (1994) influential phrase, they break the ‘dialectical stalemate’ that had come to be characteristic of the free will debate – and they break it, moreover, in favor of compatibilism. By showing that alternative possibilities are not necessary for moral responsibility, they remove the main source of the intuitive attractiveness of libertarianism. In this paper, I will argue that this view is false: FSCs do not break the dialectical stalemate at all. Instead, they leave everything more or less as it was. This paper, unusually, therefore does not claim to advance the debate, but to take it backwards.
منابع مشابه
Vihvelin on Frankfurt-Style Cases and the Actual- Sequence View
This is a critical discussion of Vihvelin’s recent book Causes, Laws, and Free Will. I discuss Vihvelin’s ideas on Frankfurt-style cases and the actual-sequence view of freedom that is inspired by them.
متن کاملOn the Impertinence of Frankfurt-Style Argument
As Daniel Speak notes in a recent article, the debate over Frankfurt-style examples (FSE) has focused overwhelmingly on whether such examples in fact show the principle of alternative possibilities (PAP) to be false. According to Speak, in the rush to attack and defend the examples themselves, a subtler and more devastating criticism of the FSE has been missed. For even if the FSE falsify PAP, ...
متن کاملWhy Hybrid Case-Based Reasoning Will Change the Future of Health Science and Healthcare
The rapid development of the medical field makes it impossible even for experts in the field to keep up with new treatments and experience. Already in 2010 all medical knowledge doubled in 3,5 years, to keep up to date with all development even in a narrow field is today far beyond human capacity. The need for decision support is increasingly important to ensure optimal treatment of patients, e...
متن کاملa Free Lunch ?
526 NOTICES OF THE AMS VOLUME 51, NUMBER 5 The notion of arbitrage is crucial in the modern theory of finance. It is the cornerstone of the option pricing theory due to F. Black and M. Scholes (published in 1973, Nobel Prize in Economics 1997). The underlying idea is best explained by telling a little joke. A finance professor and a normal person go on a walk, and the normal person sees a €100 ...
متن کامل